4.7/10
5,030
67 user 76 critic

XX (2017)

Trailer
1:32 | Trailer

Watch Now

From $3.99 (SD) on Amazon Video

Four short horror films that are directed and written by women.

Writers:

(story by), (written for the screen by) | 4 more credits »
Reviews
Popularity
240 ( 61)

Comic-Con 2017: All Aboard the IMDboat

 | 

July 20 to 23, 2017

Get entertainment news, trailer drops, and photos with IMDb's coverage of 2017 San Diego Comic-Con featuring host and IMDboat captain Kevin Smith, including Saturday's live event.

Browse Our Guide to Comic-Con

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
Susan Jacobs (segment "The Box")
...
Robert Jacobs (segment "The Box")
...
Danny Jacobs (segment "The Box")
...
Jenny Jacobs (segment "The Box")
...
Dr. Weller (segment "The Box")
...
The Man (segment "The Box")
...
Mary (segment "The Birthday Party")
...
David (segment "The Birthday Party")
...
Lucy (segment "The Birthday Party")
...
Carla (segment "The Birthday Party")
...
Madeleine (segment "The Birthday Party")
...
Party Goer (segment "The Birthday Party")
Jay Chirinos ...
Party Goer (segment "The Birthday Party")
...
Party Goer (segment "The Birthday Party")
Brooklyn Hatrak ...
Party Goer (segment "The Birthday Party")
Edit

Storyline

XX is a new horror anthology with a gender twist - all segments will be helmed by female directors and will star female leads. The directors have been given free creative rein within budget and time constraints, but all of the segments themselves will involve the horror genre. Written by Anonymous

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

Four deadly tales by four killer women

Genres:

Horror

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for horror violence, language and brief drug use | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

|

Country:

|

Language:

Release Date:

17 February 2017 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Xx  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Box Office

Opening Weekend:

$9,818 (USA) (17 February 2017)

Gross:

$30,611 (USA) (17 March 2017)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

2.39:1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Antonia Bird was originally in talks to direct a segment before her passing. The film is dedicated to her memory. See more »

Connections

References Rosemary's Baby (1968) See more »

Soundtracks

XX Theme
Written by Fesway
Performed by Sofia Orozco, Fernando Arias and Yolihuani Curiel
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Not quite good enough
19 February 2017 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

Four short horror films, no linking narrative, although there is some decent Svankmajeresque stop-motion animation serving as transition:

A boy loses his appetite after getting a glimpse of something mysterious; a woman discovers her husband's corpse on the day of her daughter's birthday; four attractive young people discover an Ancient Evil (TM) in the wilderness; and a mother deals with the discovery that her nearly adult son is disturbingly violent and yet everybody worships the ground he walks on.

Production values tend to adequate-high, and effects are acceptable, but there are small issues with each section that leave the overall film feeling amateurish. They're generally small issues, and I expect the filmmakers to work them out for their next projects.

Narratives are disappointing, generally from the lack of resolution-- although inconsistent characterization and unimaginable motives plague the second, making it the weakest. I can enjoy unresolved horror shorts in general, but it doesn't work here, not with the way these films are implemented; there's too much dragging along at each end, suggesting a reveal that never materializes.

The first was my favorite, and I found it generally creepy, although, again, the resolution was handled poorly; there were also some instances of poor acting, and too much voice-over exposition.

The "theme" of XX is apparently that all four films were directed by women, but there's not really any significance to that. If the title wasn't so eager to let me know, I wouldn't have realized it, and it kind of feels like painting a handgun pink for marketing purposes, a little dubious. Still, it's not a big deal to me, just a title. But after knowing, a few things stand out: the inversion of stereotypes for the parents in the first film; the unwillingness to commit to any crazy-lady characterization in the second, even though that's the only thing that would give the story even a lick of sense; the self-important and overly long soliloquy in the final film. (The only thing that maybe stands out in the third is that none of the attractive young people decide to disrobe, as they do so often in similar films.)

I'd say that the first film is probably worth watching, but I wouldn't bother watching past that. Not worth paying money for. Still, there's no reason not to expect good things from the filmmakers in the future, as they find some better scripts and improve their techniques.


32 of 46 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?